http://futurezone.orf.at/futurezone.orf?read=detail&id=272841&tmp=16475

The brazilian guy that got executed by english police!

Note the difference in the 3 different countries on how to report on the issue.

Very funny detail; difference in what the pictures show!

Tagesanzeiger vs. bbc

http://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/dyn/news/ausland/530031.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4157892.stm

Also interesting in sweden "forgetting on reporting" who is responsible for the first misleading information spread through massmedia.

http://www.svd.se/dynamiskt/utrikes/did_10335540.asp

Most of you allready know that i do not believe in the official story of the 9/11 incident. There are just too many anomalities starting with the pentagon, bush comments and going all the way to the passanger lists of the airliners. I believe that the airplanes were in fact not hijacked but rather remotely steered towards the WTC. You think i am a nut? Well consider this:

DARPA developed in the seventies a technique to remotely fly airoplanes for strategic defence puposes. However this technology was then being further developed and optimized within civilian applications. The main aim of the project was to ensure that one could controll an airoplane from the ground after it had been hijacked in order to safely bring it to the ground. As modern aircraft fly by wire the system completely shuts down the cockpit rendering any attempts by the pilot/kidnapper to regain controll useless. You don't think its possible? Well consider this that one does in fact not need a pilot to fly the airoplane... all can be done via the broadcomputer. The system furthermore has an external link to the boardcomputer which through a "back door" can take FULL controll over the plane. The "transponder" (a signal which identifies the plane) is just the channel which is used to access the backdoor. Upond taking controll of the airplane this code is automatically switched off. Interesting is that all four of the airoplanes of the "9/11 attack" had their transponder codes turned off immediately before being "hijacked" (now remember that the supposed hijackers had no idea how to fly an airoplane or even turn a transponder code off).

Here the juicy bit: When the airplane is accessed externally the blackbox cockpit inputs are switched off however the device still records thus leaving no recordings at all on them. None of the plackboxes found of the 9/11 planes had any recordings on them after they had been hijacked. This is due to that the blackbox is on a 30 minutes continuous tape: Is the plane hijacked for more than 30 minutes then there will be no recordings.

Over 600 airplanes have this technology installed. I.e. over 600 (american made: MD, Boeing etc) airplanes can be hijacked from the ground.

The recent Helios crash is just another mystery. The Boeing 737 built in 1998 had been working fine and several european tests had not found any faults with it (despite of what propaganda media claim. As the head of Flight revue states aircon problems cannot kill all within a few seconds). The airplane had been flying straigt had then banked down, made another flight correction pointing the nose further down and finally another correction: this time the airplanes nose was more or less making a radical dive. Here comes the juicy bit: The blackbox was empty...

Caracas, Tuesday 2.07.05: An MD82 reports all engines were failing then communication breaks and the airplane makes a steep dive towards the ground. Again no faults were found with the airplane in previous inspections.

I don't believe the CIA or whatever is involved in the helios crash. But the code might have been cracked by others.